Overregulating the chemistry industry jeopardizes innovation, jobs, and economic growth. Learn more.

  • Read time: 3 minutes
  • Press Release

Chlorine Panel of The American Chemistry Council Criticizes EPA’s Overly Restrictive Final Risk Management Rule on Carbon Tetrachloride (CTC)

CONTACT US
Erich Shea
CONTACT US

WASHINGTON (Dec. 16, 2024) – The Chlorine Panel of the American Chemistry Council today expressed deep disappointment in the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) final Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) risk management rule on carbon tetrachloride (CTC). This rule imposes unnecessary burdens on industries critical to climate goals and national infrastructure while failing to adequately consider scientific and technical factors.

Robert Simon, Vice President of Chemical Products & Technology | ACC
EPA’s rigid and impractical requirements for carbon tetrachloride risk management are a step backward for regulatory pragmatism and chemical safety. The rule ignores EPA’s own guidance, extensive scientific evidence, and industry feedback, resulting in an unworkable regulatory framework that undermines critical sectors of our economy.

Unrealistic Existing Chemical Exposure Limit (ECEL)

EPA has set an ECEL of 0.03 ppm—a value significantly lower than international standards and 333 times lower than OSHA’s permissible exposure limit. ACC has repeatedly highlighted that this threshold is impractical for routine monitoring and compliance with currently available technology. Manufacturers have stressed that meeting this ECEL will require investments in engineering controls and monitoring systems that are still under development, making the compliance timeline infeasible.

Insufficient Implementation Timeline

The rule grants only 18 months for initial monitoring and 21 months for full compliance with workplace chemical protection programs. This timeline does not account for the technical challenges and supply chain disruptions involved in achieving compliance with such a low occupational exposure limit.

Critical Uses Overlooked

ACC supports EPA’s decision to allow certain uses of CTC in closed-system applications, such as its role as a feedstock for producing low global warming potential hydrofluoroolefins (HFOs). However, the rule still falls short by imposing unwarranted constraints that threaten the future of industries essential to achieving the nation’s climate and energy goals.

Call for Reconsideration

The Chlorine Panel urges EPA to reconsider its decision, especially regarding the ECEL and implementation timeline, and to align the final rule with the best available science.

About the Chlorine Panel

The Chlorine Panel of the American Chemistry Council represents manufacturers and users of chlorinated organics. The Panel promotes the safe, effective, and scientifically grounded use of chlorine and its derivatives, promoting sustainable innovation for future generations. For more information, please visit: https://www.americanchemistry.com/industry-groups/chlorinated-solvents/carbon-tetrachloride.

American Chemistry Council

The American Chemistry Council’s mission is to advocate for the people, policy, and products of chemistry that make the United States the global leader in innovation and manufacturing. To achieve this, we: Champion science-based policy solutions across all levels of government; Drive continuous performance improvement to protect employees and communities through Responsible Care®; Foster the development of sustainability practices throughout ACC member companies; and Communicate authentically with communities about challenges and solutions for a safer, healthier and more sustainable way of life. Our vision is a world made better by chemistry, where people live happier, healthier, and more prosperous lives, safely and sustainably—for generations to come.